How do Manatal and Recruiterflow pricing compare?

Both publish their pricing. Manatal is $15 per user per month on Professional (annual), $35 on Enterprise and $55 on Enterprise Plus, with AI recommendations included. Recruiterflow is a flat $119 per user per month on Platform, with a Custom tier above. Manatal is the cheapest AI ATS; Recruiterflow's $119 buys automation, AIRA and sequences that Manatal keeps lighter.

Which one has stronger automation?

Recruiterflow. It ships AIRA, visual no-code workflow automation and native email and SMS sequences with reply detection on the standard plan. Manatal keeps outreach to email and text with light automation and no reply detection. Neither chains email, LinkedIn and messaging into a single automated sequence.

Which one is better for sourcing?

It depends on the motion. Manatal includes bulk LinkedIn import from Recruiter and Sales Navigator lists and AI candidate recommendations from $15. Recruiterflow includes an email finder and a LinkedIn extension but no bulk import. Manatal leads on bulk LinkedIn sourcing; Recruiterflow leads on reaching candidates by email.

How do their client CRM features compare?

Recruiterflow runs a deeper client CRM with accounts, deal tracking, a portal and native phone. Manatal includes a client CRM with a portal and pipeline, but its deal tracking is limited and there is no native phone. A client-heavy, phone-driven desk fits Recruiterflow; a small agency is well served by Manatal.

Is Manatal a real alternative to Recruiterflow?

For a budget-focused team that wants AI matching and bulk sourcing, yes: Manatal covers the ATS, a client CRM and AI recommendations at a fraction of the price. For a firm that wants automation, sequences with reply detection and a deeper CRM, Recruiterflow earns its higher price over Manatal.

How hard is it to migrate between Manatal and Recruiterflow?

Both support CSV import and export for candidates, contacts and notes, and both offer onboarding help. Neither has a native connector to the other, so plan for field mapping and, for large datasets, a phased migration.

Manatal vs Recruiterflow: is $15 enough, or is automation worth $119?

Feature by feature: pricing and value, sourcing and AI, automation and sequences, and CRM depth. Where each platform pulls ahead for a recruitment agency in 2026, and where both leave a gap.

Or meet the third option built for recruiters: Jarvi.

View detailed analysis

Try Jarvi for free

TL;DR

Positioning

Manatal fits small and mid-size teams that want the cheapest all-in-one AI ATS, with candidate recommendations and bulk sourcing included and a clean interface. Recruiterflow fits agencies that want automation, an AI assistant and recruiting sequences out of the box, and will pay more for workflow depth and a deeper CRM.

Why it matters

Manatal publishes pricing from $15 per user per month with AI recommendations and bulk LinkedIn import included, while Recruiterflow is a published $119 with AIRA, visual workflow automation, native email and SMS sequences and a deeper client CRM. The split is clear: Manatal is the cheapest AI ATS, Recruiterflow the automation-and-outreach platform.

The catch

Where both stop: neither runs a true multichannel outbound sequence across email, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Telegram and SMS at once, and neither reads a candidate reply to advance the pipeline across channels.

At a glance

Criterion	Manatal	RecruiterFlow	Edge
Pricing & value	From $15, AI recommendations included	Flat $119, automation included	Manatal
Sourcing & AI	Bulk LinkedIn import, AI recommendations	Email finder, AIRA assistant	Manatal
Automation & sequences	Light automation, email and SMS	AIRA, visual automation, sequences	RecruiterFlow
CRM & workflow depth	CRM present, lighter sales depth	Deeper CRM, deal tracking, phone	RecruiterFlow

Detailed technical comparison

Cross-analysis of tools: Sourcing, Data, and Pricing.

Comparison table: Manatal and RecruiterFlow (ATS & CRM features)
Key features		Manatal	RecruiterFlow
Sourcing
	1-click company import Import of companies with automatic data enrichment Import of companies with automatic data enrichment		Add a company from LinkedIn via paid extension and one-company at a time
	1-click profile import via Chrome extension A browser extension that adds a candidate to your ATS in one click, with their profile data A browser extension that adds a candidate to your ATS in one click, with their profile data		Add profiles from LinkedIn via paid extension and one-profile at a time
	Professional Network Sync Import your professional network, with profile enrichment Import your professional network, with profile enrichment		Not found in product and not documented
	External sourcing results import Import a sourcing project's pipeline, keeping its stages and metadata Import a sourcing project's pipeline, keeping its stages and metadata		Not found in product and not documented
	External leads list import Import and sync prospect lists built outside the ATS Import and sync prospect lists built outside the ATS	Sources do not mention any native import for Sales Navigator lists beyond general Chrome extension sourcing	Not found in product and not documented
	Legal data synchronization during imports Syncs company registration and legal identifiers (via Pappers or similar sources) during LinkedIn imports to maintain compliant, up-to-date client data Syncs company registration and legal identifiers (via Pappers or similar sources) during LinkedIn imports to maintain compliant, up-to-date client data		Not found in product and not documented
	Email finder / contact discovery Find verified email addresses for profiles on LinkedIn or other sites, allowing you to contact them directly Find verified email addresses for profiles on LinkedIn or other sites, allowing you to contact them directly	The Find Contact Details feature retrieves verified emails and phone numbers from a large external database but is sold as a separate add-on with monthly credits, not included by default in all plans	Claims large DB
	Automatic data completion Automatically finds and adds missing data to profiles, such as a candidate's new job title, company logo, or company industry Automatically finds and adds missing data to profiles, such as a candidate's new job title, company logo, or company industry		Via extension/email finder
AI & Automation
Outreach
ATS
CRM
Analytics
Integrations
Collaboration & UX
Data Security
Market proof
Support
Pricing

Manatal is $15, Recruiterflow is a flat $119

ManatalRecruiterflowEdge: Manatal

Two things decide who each tool is for: how much it costs and what comes included. Both publish their pricing, so the comparison is about the entry point and what you get for it.

Manatal

Manatal publishes $15 per user per month on Professional (annual), $35 on Enterprise and $55 on Enterprise Plus, with a 14-day free trial. AI candidate recommendations, scoring and bulk LinkedIn import are included on every tier. For a small or mid team, the cost of ownership is the lowest in the category, with the AI matching built in from the entry price.

Recruiterflow

Recruiterflow is a flat $119 per user per month on its Platform plan, with a free trial and a Custom tier above for more AI agents. There is no cheaper entry tier, but the standard plan already includes AIRA, visual automation and email and SMS sequences, so the $119 buys a more complete automation set than Manatal's entry price does.

Verdict. For the lowest price with AI recommendations included, Manatal wins clearly. Recruiterflow's $119 buys automation, AIRA and sequences that Manatal keeps lighter.

Manatal sources in bulk and recommends candidates, Recruiterflow finds emails

ManatalRecruiterflowEdge: Manatal

Sourcing decides how much a recruiter retypes, and the AI layer decides how much matching the platform does for them. Both include AI, aimed at different parts of the job.

Manatal

Manatal sources through a Chrome extension with bulk LinkedIn import, including from Recruiter and Sales Navigator lists, and includes AI candidate recommendations, scoring, profile analysis and resume parsing on every tier, plus a career-page builder. For a sourcing-active team, bulk import and AI matching are built in from $15. Contact discovery is lighter than a dedicated email finder.

Recruiterflow

Recruiterflow includes an email finder with a large database and a LinkedIn Chrome extension, plus AIRA for candidate scoring, profile analysis and job-description writing. It has no bulk LinkedIn import, so sourcing starts from single captures and the email finder. AIRA covers scoring and writing rather than surfacing recommendations from a pool.

Verdict. Manatal builds bulk LinkedIn import and AI recommendations into the entry price. Recruiterflow answers with an email finder and AIRA. Pick on whether you source in bulk from LinkedIn or reach candidates by email.

Recruiterflow automates and sequences out of the box, Manatal keeps it light

ManatalRecruiterflowEdge: Recruiterflow

Outreach and automation turn a sourced profile into a booked conversation. The question is how much of the cadence and workflow the platform runs on its own.

Manatal

Manatal covers two-way email sync, native SMS to candidates and nurturing, with a small automation that adjusts greetings to the time of day and basic trigger-based rules. It has no reply detection and no visual no-code workflow builder, so outreach stays email-and-text with light automation rather than a running cadence engine.

Recruiterflow

Recruiterflow ships visual no-code workflow automation and native recruiting sequences over email and SMS with follow-ups that stop when a candidate replies. Automations trigger on pipeline events to move candidates, send messages and update records, so a small agency gets a real automation and outbound engine from day one on the standard plan.

Verdict. Recruiterflow runs the deeper automation and sequencing, including reply detection and visual workflows. Manatal keeps outreach to email and text with light automation. Neither runs a true email-to-LinkedIn-to-WhatsApp sequence on its own.

Recruiterflow runs a deeper client CRM, Manatal keeps the sales side light

ManatalRecruiterflowEdge: Recruiterflow

Agencies sell to clients as much as they recruit, so the CRM and workflow side matters: accounts, deal tracking, phone and client portals. Both have a CRM, with a difference in depth.

Manatal

Manatal includes a client CRM with a portal and a pipeline, but its accounts and sales functions are lighter: deal tracking is limited, there is no native phone, and no assignment rules for large teams. It covers a small agency that tracks clients alongside candidates, but a client-heavy or phone-driven desk will feel the ceiling.

Recruiterflow

Recruiterflow runs a deeper client CRM with accounts, deal tracking, a hiring-manager portal and a BD pipeline, plus native phone and send-time optimization. For an agency that manages a real sales motion and calls candidates and clients, the CRM and workflow depth is a reason to pay more than Manatal's entry price.

Verdict. For a firm that manages clients, deals and calls in detail, Recruiterflow's deeper CRM and native phone lead. Manatal covers the client side well enough for a small agency, at a fraction of the price.

Pricing at a glance

per user / month, annual billing

	Manatal	RecruiterFlow
Entry	$15 Professional15 jobs, 10,000 candidates	$119 PlatformATS, CRM, automation, AIRA, sequences, API
Growth	$35 Enterpriseunlimited, automations, CRM	Custom AIRA planfull AI agent suite, advanced BI, onboarding
Advanced	$55 Enterprise PlusSSO, open API, priority support	—
AI included	AI candidate recommendations and scoring on all tiers	AIRA and automation on the standard plan; top agents on Custom

Which fits which team?

Neither tool wins outright. The right pick comes down to whether you want the cheapest AI matching and bulk sourcing, or automation, sequences and a deeper CRM at a higher published price.

Choose Manatal if:

You want the lowest price, from $15, with AI recommendations included
You want bulk LinkedIn import and AI candidate scoring
You want a career-page builder and fast onboarding
Your client CRM needs are light rather than a full sales operation
You run a small or mid-size team on a tight budget

Choose Recruiterflow if:

You want AIRA, visual automation and sequences on the standard plan
You want native email and SMS sequences with reply detection
You want a deeper client CRM with deal tracking and native phone
You value a clean interface and quick onboarding
A flat $119 with more included beats a cheaper, lighter entry tier

If neither profile fits cleanly, for example a team that wants exposed agentic AI, native multichannel sequences and EU data hosting at transparent pricing, it is worth widening the shortlist.

Jarvi: the third option that closes the gap Manatal and Recruiterflow leave open

Manatal keeps its automation light and outreach to email and text; Recruiterflow automates email and SMS but stops short of LinkedIn and messaging in one chain. Neither runs one sequence across email, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Telegram and SMS that moves the pipeline from any channel.

Vs Manatal. Against Manatal, Jarvi goes past email-and-text outreach and light automation: sequences run across five channels at once, with an AI copilot that suggests the next best action for each candidate.

Vs RecruiterFlow. Against Recruiterflow, Jarvi goes past email-and-SMS sequences: the same cadence runs across five channels at once, and reply detection moves the pipeline from any of them rather than only stopping a sequence.

The Jarvi differentiator

The difference is AI reply detection that spans every channel. A candidate answers with interest, Jarvi stops the sequence and alerts the recruiter. They reply 'not now', Jarvi schedules a six-month recall. They decline, the record is archived cleanly with its notes. That cross-channel automation, missing from both tools here, takes hours of manual follow-up off each recruiter every week.

See Jarvi in a guided demo

About Manatal

Manatal was founded in 2019 in Bangkok by Jeremy Fichet and Yassine Bel Mamoun, and raised a $5.1M seed led by Surge, Sequoia's accelerator, in 2022. It is an affordable all-in-one ATS and CRM for small and mid-size agencies, with AI candidate recommendations and scoring, a Chrome extension for sourcing, and a career-page builder. Pricing is published from $15 per user per month on annual billing, with a 14-day free trial. It holds about 4.6 on Capterra and 4.4 on G2, with fast onboarding and value for money its most cited strengths, and serves more than 10,000 recruitment teams across 135+ countries. Its distinctive strength is an AI ATS at an entry-level price.

About RecruiterFlow

Recruiterflow was founded in 2017 by Manan Shah, Naresh Shenoy and Amritanshu Anand, second-time founders and IIT alumni. It is built for small and mid-size staffing and recruiting agencies, and reports more than 2,100 firms running on it. The platform combines an ATS and CRM with an AI assistant (AIRA) for candidate scoring and job-description writing, visual workflow automation, recruiting sequences and a LinkedIn Chrome extension. Pricing is published at $119 per user per month with a free trial. It holds 4.6 on G2 (about 156 reviews) and 4.7 on Capterra, praised for its clean interface and quick onboarding. Its distinctive strength is a fast, agency-focused setup at transparent pricing.

FAQ: Manatal vs RecruiterFlow

This comparison guide analyzes the critical differences between Manatal and RecruiterFlow: pricing policy, free trial, customer support quality, and sourcing power. Use this data to choose the best-fit ATS for your agency.

Compare Jarvi to other market players

Compare other software with Manatal

Bullhorn vs Manatal

Crelate vs Manatal

Loxo vs Manatal

Manatal vs RecruitCRM

Compare other software with RecruiterFlow

Bullhorn vs RecruiterFlow

Crelate vs RecruiterFlow

Loxo vs RecruiterFlow

RecruitCRM vs RecruiterFlow

Back to software comparison

Ready to switch to Jarvi?

Join hundreds of agencies that made the switch to Jarvi. Book a demo to see how we can help you recruit better, faster, and more affordably.

Book a demo

Manatal analyzed on December 5, 2025 • RecruiterFlow analyzed on November 17, 2025 — If you have any updates or corrections to share, please help us keep this article accurate and up-to-date via the chat in the bottom right corner.